On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:49:07 +0200, Eddy Petrișor <[email protected]> wrote: >> I started a comparison of the major navigation/routing-applications >> used with OSM. The Routing -page just got too cramped and a simple >> list of names of dozens of apps helps noone. > > I agree, I have been looking for this info for a while now.
> Nice, but I suspect is better to list applications vertically and > features horizontally, since is easier to add a new template line than > to modify each line to add a single app. I think this point is already > proven by the addition of the gpsmid app which is lower on the page, > but not in the table. I don't suspect we get enough information to get more then just the major applications into the table at all. Anyway we will have many more features then applications. This the table would grow terribly wide. If you want you can try it out on the talk-page and we can see. I may be wrong in my assumption. Marcus _______________________________________________ Routing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/routing
