Eddy Petrișor schrieb: >> I don't suspect we get enough information to get more then just >> the major applications into the table at all. Anyway we will have many > > The way the table is arranged now, it even discourages possible new > applications to be added. > >> more features then applications. This the table would grow terribly wide. > > I think this layout is better: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Software
That table has very short headings. What can we do about the explanations for each heading we have? I guess the grouping of headers can be done using 2 header-rows and colspans. We`ll see how it looks when you`re done, ok? :) Marcus _______________________________________________ Routing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/routing
