Josh Doe schrieb:
Has anyone done something with safe pedestrian routing profiles?
Me not - but maybe you would consider my input, too? ;-)
== Safe walking, least distance ==
* Allow use of highway=footway, highway=path, highway=cycleway,
highway=steps, highway=living_street, highway=pedestrian,
highway=bridleway, highway=service, and highway=residential unless
there is a foot=no/private tag.
I suppose you have to consider some more restrictions - or pitfalls of
the tagging, namely in continental Europe ...
- highway=path or highway=cycleway with bicycle=designated or =official,
which implies foot=no in some countries, which may not be tagged
explicitly then.
- highway=cycleway where some people in some countries think it implies
bicycle=designated or =official which implies foot=no - so they do not
tag that explicitly.
Similar for bridleway.
Some people think, implicit tags should not be tagged or be deleted -
may be, they will see the problems finally sometimes in the future ...
You have a sublime approach - maybe you should use your chance to twist
the knife (in this wound) and open some(ones) eyes. ;-)
Sorry for such bad input - here, and in the database.
Georg
_______________________________________________
Routing mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/routing
