Hi, Many routing applications only support a single "from", "to" and "via" entity. Actually, most only support restrictions in the form:
from way1 via node to way2. So if you want to add a relation that is understood by as many applications as possible, I would advise you to split it into 4. Best regards, Christian On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Gubler, Ruediger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question about the below turn restriction definition > > <osm version="0.6" generator="OpenStreetMap server"> > <relation id="339483" > visible="true" > timestamp="2012-06-29T07:37:40Z" > version="4" > changeset="12053445" > user="Drachentoeter" > uid="63726"> > <member type="node" ref="82520384" role="via"/> > <member type="way" ref="49025950" role="to"/> > <member type="way" ref="28191636" role="from"/> > <member type="way" ref="169412714" role="from"/> > <member type="way" ref="169412708" role="from"/> > <member type="way" ref="169412713" role="from"/> > <tag k="restriction" v="no_left_turn"/> > <tag k="type" v="restriction"/> > </relation> > </osm> > > According to the wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Turn_Restriction) > multiple from roles are only allowed at > restriction=no_entry or restriction=no_exit elements. > > Is the above definition correct and the wiki is wrong or must the relation be > divided into 4 parts? > > > Yours Rüdiger > > > _______________________________________________ > Routing mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/routing _______________________________________________ Routing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/routing
