> IIRC, the spec says that you don't have to include <string>..</string>.
> If there is no type tag after value, it is assumed that it is a string.
Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at
http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and it did not mention a default tag type
(unless I am wrong, which happens once in a while). Is there a more
formal RFC, or a document that is more explicit about the formating?thanks, --Michael
