On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 22:39, Michael Guymon wrote: > > > IIRC, the spec says that you don't have to include <string>..</string>. > > If there is no type tag after value, it is assumed that it is a string. > > > Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at > http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and it did not mention a default tag type > (unless I am wrong, which happens once in a while). Is there a more > formal RFC, or a document that is more explicit about the formating?
nope.. that's the spec.. this might just be some 'local knowledge' I've remembered but I'm pretty sure it is correct. josh
