On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 10:37 AM, Kurt Werle wrote: > On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 10:26 AM, josh lucas wrote: > >> On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kurt Werle wrote: >> >>>> Guys, I have to say I am mystified and irritated. My interceptors >>>> patch has >>>> been around for over a year. >>> ... >>> >>> I joined this list to skulk about and see what's going on with >>> xmlrpc. Mostly because it seems to be sitting around and rotting. >>> I'm wondering why someone doesn't grab it and move it to Sourceforge >>> where folks can make useful contributions and it won't stagnate. >>> >>> Just a thought. >> >> I fail to see how moving the code to Sourceforge will help. > > Sourceforge seems to me to be much more open to peer contribution than > apache projects ever have. Apache projects have always seemed to be > good ole boys network.
Umm.. no. > >> I will try and reacquaint myself with the code and see what I can do >> to help with getting those patches in.. > > Exactly my point. If, for example, I was running the xmlrpc project on > SF, and Aaron had contributed his patch there, I'd have invited him to > join the dev team and submit the patches directly. > > Not that I have any intention of doing the above - I'm happy to be an > xmlrpc user. I think that the interceptor stuff looks very > interesting, and would probably have helped my current project out, but > I didn't know about it until I came sniffing around. That such useful > code has been left out for about a year is a real let-down. > Fair enough. As I said, I'll reacquaint myself with the code and we'll go from there. josh
