On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 12:21 PM, Adam Megacz wrote: > > josh lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> wondering why someone doesn't grab it and move it to Sourceforge where >> I fail to see how moving the code to Sourceforge will help. > > It might have something to do with this: > > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Seeing as how I seem to be the only one still doing maintainence on >> this package, it will be committed when I get around to it. > > I think Josh is expressing his desire to fork the code since the > current maintainence team is clearly overburdened and has not > appointed any new maintainers. Sourceforge just happens to be his > hosting provider of choice. >
I think you got the replies confused because I have no desire to fork the code but obviously if someone feels the need to, the license allows it. I think that would be silly though but perhaps not. josh
