Daniel Rall wrote:
"Andrew Evers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:At this point we have several new features coming in:
Well, it depends on whether we will use a branch or a tag. I'd preferDepending upon the size of your change, let's either tag what's there
not to use a branch, bit I don't really mind which. If there is any
debate, let it be now (I think you guys are awake now, since it's
evening here). If I don't hear anything I will tag whatever's in CVS
with the next sensible pre tag and then commit all I have to HEAD. I
can always back it out later ;)
as XMLRPC_1_2_A3, or branch it as XMLRPC_1_2_BRANCH and call the next
release 2.0. Either way, you're free to work in HEAD. How big are
your changes? Do they warrant a major point release?
- abstracted transport
- abstracted logging
- subpackage reorganization and cleanup, possibly resulting in several JAR alternatives for our users
- possibly the introspection and interceptors patch?
- possibly Mavenizing the build and website
If we end up with this many new features, I would call that a major point release.
Would you guys comment on the above features? Anything in there you would rather we didn't do? Anything I missed? Anything need more explanation?
--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net
