On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 08:34 PM, Ryan Hoegg wrote:
Going by the above features, I think a major point release would be warranted especially if we are going offer various jars for people to grab.Daniel Rall wrote:At this point we have several new features coming in:"Andrew Evers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Well, it depends on whether we will use a branch or a tag. I'd prefer not to use a branch, bit I don't really mind which. If there is any debate, let it be now (I think you guys are awake now, since it's evening here). If I don't hear anything I will tag whatever's in CVS with the next sensible pre tag and then commit all I have to HEAD. I can always back it out later ;)Depending upon the size of your change, let's either tag what's there as XMLRPC_1_2_A3, or branch it as XMLRPC_1_2_BRANCH and call the next release 2.0. Either way, you're free to work in HEAD. How big are your changes? Do they warrant a major point release?
- abstracted transport
- abstracted logging
- subpackage reorganization and cleanup, possibly resulting in several JAR alternatives for our users
- possibly the introspection and interceptors patch?
- possibly Mavenizing the build and website
If we end up with this many new features, I would call that a major point release.
Would you guys comment on the above features? Anything in there you would rather we didn't do? Anything I missed? Anything need more explanation?
josh
