On Jun 21, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Jun 21, 2008, at 5:15 AM, Denis Washington wrote:
As promised, here's certain issues I see in the current
implementation.
IMHO, your markup needs to be thought through more carefully, if the
"Exmples and attributes" section at
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/LSB_Package_API
is any indication.
Sure markup is easy, and you can always consider your markup
to be domain specific to the LSB "Berlin API".
Meanwhile, there are any number of types of pre-existing
markup that could/should be borrowed instead
Re-inventing a Newer! Better! Bestest! markup that requires Yet
Another Set Of
Parsers to be written in python/perl/ruby/whatever will
determine the rate of adoption of the application, not otherwise, imho.
FWIW your "Berlin API" markup is no better or worse than most, just
different.
hth
73 de Jeff
______________________________________________________________________
RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org
LSB Communication List rpm-lsb@rpm5.org
