First, I don't see why you need the rich deps here. Wouldn't a 
`libfoo.so.1(do_foo@FOO_1.0)(64bit))` requires be enough?

Then, wouldn't your proposal mean that over time you'll have a provide for 
every symbol? That'll be quite some burden on the metadata size and dependency 
solver setup. If you really want something like this you should look at 
altlinux's support of set-versions dependencies (IIRC).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/362#issuecomment-345475643
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to