@n3npq With this patch we would basically allow everything to be signed for
which we have signatures since we previously only filtered out %config files
that were not executable. If a %ghost file has a signature stored in the rpm,
it would at least now have it written out as well. If %ghost files are not even
written out (per docu: 'There are times when a file should be owned by the
package but not installed.') then ... why would we need to sign them?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/374#issuecomment-364573457
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
