@n3npq  With this patch we would basically allow everything to be signed for 
which we have signatures since we previously only filtered out %config files 
that were not executable. If a %ghost file has a signature stored in the rpm, 
it would at least now have it written out as well. If %ghost files are not even 
written out (per docu: 'There are times when a file should be owned by the 
package but not installed.') then ... why would we need to sign them?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Rpm-maint mailing list

Reply via email to