I would understand the side-effects of a per-file AND mask that is active
inside the plugin, but don't understand what potential side effects this on all
callers could have if this was pushed inside rpmfiFlags().
The regular expression could provide more control to the user. A `.*`, as
indicated above, which would mean 'write out signatures on all %config files'
could work equivalent to the current solution. An empty string means that 'no
%config file signature' should written out. Multiple regex's could be
comma-separated or each one surrounded with quotes. Any suggestions if we
wanted to go down this road? Otherwise I am not quite clear how to proceed. Do
regex's give enough control to the user if he installs a bunch of RPMs via dnf?
So how do we proceed with this patch here? If it needs modification, then
'how?' Any concrete suggestions would be appreciated.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/374#issuecomment-364679282
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
