> I'm sorry, are you obtuse? I know these are dynamic in Fedora. But Fedora
> isn't the only RPM-based Linux distribution.
My comment started with "BTW". It means in this case that this comment has
nothing to do with submitted PR patches. Those patches have nothing to do with
what people are doing in OpenSuse and why they are doing this that way. Is it
clear now?
Please focus on the topic of the PR.
I think that I've already delivered enough pieces of evidence that
**generally** using --print-requires-private generates to broad dependencies as
long as none of the open source projects packaged using rpm are using
Requires.private using --print-requires-private option.
So far nothing that has been mentioned in the comments here is in contradiction
with such claim.
The only impact which will cause remove --print-requires-private option will be
dropping few thousands of dependencies which will not break any existing build
procedures described in existing specs files.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/411#issuecomment-372605406
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
