Sorry but I don't understand this bug report any more than the referenced
bugzilla item.
Surely you're not suggesting the demonstrated rpm cli behavior is buggy? So
what exactly is the problem here? Python addErase() on a non-existent header id
not returning error, or something else? Rpm certainly does ignore duplicate
erasure requests, eg when a thing is already marked for erasure through an
upgrade, and then specific erasure is added, this is just ignored aka skipped.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1214#issuecomment-627272287
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
