Please could you look at dnf/db/group.py:_populate_rpm_ts()? There you will see
that for each element in swdb we created a single rpm transaction element. The
problem is when transaction elements do not match after transaction.
When I created any transaction element in rpm (ts.addErase(tsi.pkg.idx)) I
expect that the transaction element will not disappear.
Is it clear now?
I need to know - is transaction disappearing behaviour a bug (I believe that
this a bug)? If this is a feature I need to know how to detect disappeared
transaction item and a reason.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1214#issuecomment-627909695
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
