> Would it make sense to change `%check` as the PR here does, and at the same
> time also add a `%check_buildroot` or something that's the equivalent of the
> current `%check` and runs after `%install`?
IMHO, no. Rpm is not just the handful of packages in Fedora dist-git. It's also
suse and other distros, and local non-distributable packages, and existing
tutorials, and packit, and rpms from the last 20 years. We could "fix" (unbreak
would be a better word) the handful of packages under our control, but nothing
else.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1618#issuecomment-814822076
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
