I find `packaged` quite misleading, because the case is to allow for attributes
and generators that are local to the *build*. Those attributes *may also* be
packaged, but that's not relevant for this feature. I see two separate main
cases for this:
- build a package with the generator it ships to avoid having to build twice
- build a package with a generator that is only relevant for that package
Back to bike-shedding. `__build_file_attrs` is closer maybe but then it
suggests those are the *only* attrs for the build. `__extra_file_attrs` would
seem accurate because no matter where they come from they are extra to the
regular attrs.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2734#issuecomment-1905503860
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2734/c1905503...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
