> This all makes `__local_file_attrs` look less horrible than I first thought
Indeed. It's sufficiently vague to cover both cases we care about, and totally
accurate in the sense that its local to the build.
> `__additional_file_attrs` is actually kinda close but not quite as it implies
> that it does not contains file attrs that are already installed. What about
> `__add_file_attrs`? It's shorter and does not emphasis as much the separation
> betwenn new and already existing.
I can live with either local or add. There are bigger crisis in the world
:laughing:
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2734#issuecomment-1923549189
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2734/c1923549...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
