https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4892
--- Comment #21 from Nicolas Chauvet <[email protected]> ---
Can we try to find a compromise on the license issue with this package ?
BTW is the retroarch code itslef GPLv3 (only) or GPLv3+ ?
Seems what's unclear in the fedora guideline about this is about the bundling
situation. For example, you cannot assume the license of ffmpeg to affect
retroarch license tag because ffmpeg can be compiled from LGPLv2+ to GPLv3+. in
RPM Fusion, we compile ffmpeg with GPLv3+ and it has to be compatible with
downstream users. Which is fine if the retroarch package is tagged with GPLv3.
But if any downstream ffmpeg users use any "BSD with advertising" code which is
GPL incompatible along with LGPLv2+, both version need to be mentioned in the
package license tag to reflect that.
Can we just copy any license from the retroarch archive and tag every kind of
license once on the retroarch license tag ? Does everyone agrees on that ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
