https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7360
Nicolas Chauvet <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |[email protected]
|mfusion.org |
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet <[email protected]> ---
As such, this package is noarch, but
> Requires: kernel(x86-64) > 6.16.12-200
It means it's only relevant on x86_64.
Best would be to keep it noarch and use ExclusiveArch: x86_64.
Also the other part of the kernel version enforcement isn't reliable across
kernel "variant" (kernel-rt and alikes, that are less used nowadays).
That's said, there is a kernel-uname-r virtual provides that will enforce the
correct versioning whatever the kernel package named been used by fedora or 3rd
parties (kernel-rt, kernel-vanilla, kernel-longterm).
Please use that if you really need to enforce a version, (but then assuming the
fedora uses are using recent kernel is fine also).
so Requires: kernel-uname-r > 6.16.12-200 will work everywhere.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
