Re: what about soname bumps and rebuilds

[Reindl Harald]

Am 02.11.2015 um 19:14 schrieb Reindl Harald:

Am 02.11.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Sérgio Basto:

On Seg, 2015-11-02 at 15:35 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:

Fedora 23

* x264 so 148
* avidemux requires so 142
* the gstreamer ugly requires so 142

why does that happen *everytime* when somebody decides to bump x264
without take care of rebuild depending packages?

Where you got x264 so 148 ?

rpmfusion testing most likely?

it happens , hold your breath please

for how long?

6 days and the few deps are not rebuilt
normally that should happen instantly if not automated at all

[root@rh:~]$ ls /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1019K 2015-10-27 18:29 /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148

F21:


F23:

nothing provides libx264.so.142 needed by avidemux-qt-2.6.8-3.fc22.i686

congratulations, avidemux dependencies are now broken in stable updates too even for Fedora 21 Error: Package: avidemux-qt-2.6.10-1.fc21.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libADM_render6_QT5.so()(64bit) nothing provides libADM_render6_QT5.so()(64bit) needed by avidemux-qt-2.6.10-1.fc23.x86_64 thanks god it can't solve i686 deps on a pure x86_64 machine where dnf/yum tries to fallback because the unsolveable deps....

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature