Am 10.11.2015 um 12:16 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Ter, 2015-11-10 at 11:17 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:Am 02.11.2015 um 19:14 schrieb Reindl Harald:Am 02.11.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Sérgio Basto:On Seg, 2015-11-02 at 15:35 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:Fedora 23 * x264 so 148 * avidemux requires so 142 * the gstreamer ugly requires so 142 why does that happen *everytime* when somebody decides to bump x264 without take care of rebuild depending packages?Where you got x264 so 148 ?rpmfusion testing most likely?it happens , hold your breath pleasefor how long? 6 days and the few deps are not rebuilt normally that should happen instantly if not automated at all [root@rh:~]$ ls /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1019K 2015-10-27 18:29 /usr/lib64/libx264.so.148congratulations, avidemux dependencies are now broken in stable updates too even for Fedora 21 F21: Error: Package: avidemux-qt-2.6.10-1.fc21.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libADM_render6_QT5.so()(64bit) F23: nothing provides libADM_render6_QT5.so()(64bit) needed by avidemux-qt-2.6.10-1.fc23.x86_64 nothing provides libx264.so.142 needed by avidemux-qt-2.6.8-3.fc22.i686 thanks god it can't solve i686 deps on a pure x86_64 machine where dnf/yum tries to fallback because the unsolveable deps....https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3815
fine, don't apply to gstreamer ugly and honestly i don't understand why developers / maintainers not install their own dogfood to find out such major breaks weeks ago or just don't bump so-names shortly befor the Fedora version goes gold
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
