Hi All, These are the longstanding rpy rules (where 'x' represents any sequence of valid name character in *python*, including A-Z, a-Z anywhere and 0-9 anywhere except in the first position):
python R Example x_x x.x print_default(m) --> print.default(m) x_ x print_(m) --> print(m) However, the (proposed?) translation of 'dollar' to '$' seems problematic to me, since the string/word 'dollar' can reasonably be expected to appear in variable names. What do you have in mind for that? -G > >>> So I declared that _ > >>> to . conversion is an unconditional part of the convenience wrapper > >>> interface, comparable to data type conversion. (I also declared > that > >>> trailing underscores are stripped -- to make functions like 'class' > >>> and 'print' accessible -- and the word 'dollar' becomes '$'.) > These > >>> rules are simple, predictable, correct in vastly more cases than > doing > >>> no conversion, and for the occasional weird edge-case you can still > >>> use rcall just like now (only the weird edge-cases are much rarer). > >> "correct in more cases than doing no (name) conversion" ??? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ rpy-list mailing list rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list
