Sorry for being stupid. I did not see Python py3k yet. I saw no need. I use Python because it is available everywhere. I thought that py3k was just some syntactical different dialect. But obviously it is more. Does it have completely new data types and does it not support the types from 2.x any more?
Rüdiger 2011/3/10 Alex Grönholm <[email protected]> > 10.03.2011 18:27, Tomer Filiba kirjoitti: > > no, it's not really possible, because many types were moved between > modules, or completely dropped. > also, the object model has changed a little, and since netrefs play with > the low-level stuff, they have to be adapted. > all in all, the syntax part is the least of our concerns. > > I've done quite a bit of py3k porting work myself, so could you be a little > more specific? Maybe I can address those concerns. > > > > -tomer > > An NCO and a Gentleman > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 00:41, Rüdiger Kessel > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Sorry for asking this stupid question, but is there any good python >> preprocessor out there that can support the version problem so that the code >> can look nice, but still comes from a common code base? >> >> Ruediger >> >> >> 2011/3/9 Jorge Maroto <[email protected]> >> >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Tomer Filiba <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > yeah, i had the feeling someone would sneak in redhat and >>> > their nonexistent releases... >>> > you know, being stuck with software from 2004 in 2011... how come >>> people PAY >>> > money for that "support"? >>> >>> IMHO they just pay to have someone to put the blame on. :). >>> >> >> > >
