11.03.2011 03:32, Rüdiger Kessel kirjoitti:
I read that one, but I got the impression that changes are all local.
Why would one want to move things between modules just because it uses
py3k syntax?
It looks to me that basically the same structures should work for
both. Maybe I am missing something fundamental here.
The syntax changes are fairly radical. For example, how would you catch
named exceptions (and assign to a variable) in a way that works for both
3.x and 2.x? There is an ugly but workable way, but I'd just like to
check if you've understood the problem.
2011/3/10 Alex Grönholm <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
11.03.2011 03:17, Rüdiger Kessel kirjoitti:
Sorry for being stupid. I did not see Python py3k yet. I saw no
need. I use Python because it is available everywhere.
I thought that py3k was just some syntactical different dialect.
But obviously it is more. Does it have completely new data types
and does it not support the types from 2.x any more?
This should answer most of your questions:
http://docs.python.org/release/3.0.1/whatsnew/3.0.html
Rüdiger
2011/3/10 Alex Grönholm <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
10.03.2011 18:27, Tomer Filiba kirjoitti:
no, it's not really possible, because many types were moved
between modules, or completely dropped.
also, the object model has changed a little, and since
netrefs play with the low-level stuff, they have to be adapted.
all in all, the syntax part is the least of our concerns.
I've done quite a bit of py3k porting work myself, so could
you be a little more specific? Maybe I can address those
concerns.
-tomer
An NCO and a Gentleman
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 00:41, Rüdiger Kessel
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Sorry for asking this stupid question, but is there any
good python preprocessor out there that can support the
version problem so that the code can look nice, but
still comes from a common code base?
Ruediger
2011/3/9 Jorge Maroto <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Tomer Filiba
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> yeah, i had the feeling someone would sneak in
redhat and
> their nonexistent releases...
> you know, being stuck with software from 2004 in
2011... how come people PAY
> money for that "support"?
IMHO they just pay to have someone to put the blame
on. :).
