> On closer look, this seems to be rrdtool and not the new graph > libraries. > > denver ~ # time ./rrdtool fetch test.rrd AVERAGE > real 0m0.041s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.030s > > denver ~ # time rrdtool fetch test2.rrd AVERAGE > real 0m0.017s > user 0m0.010s > sys 0m0.000s > denver ~ # > > (rrd files above are identical, just using different inodes to prevent > caching) > > -D > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dylan Vanderhoof > > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:50 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [rrd-developers] rrdtool 1.3 cairo switch is done > > > > > > Tried this on my test server. Generated 515 graphs of ~30 days each. > > Trunk functions fine and the graphs look good, but its substantially > > slower than 1.2.23 w/ the fadvise patch. (trunk compiled > > with mmap and > > directio)
This is interesting stuff. I am interested in how much computation is necessary for Cairo/Pango vs. libart? What is the hypothesis and what would be a good benchmark for testing this change? -Matt _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
