On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:47:48AM -0500, Steve Hill wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:48:32AM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > > or if you insist to make this simpler, how about implementing a > > NANTOZERO operator ? > > Wouldn't a generic 'IFNAN' operator be more useful? That way I could > substitute any other value, as appropriate for my calculation. You > could still get the NANORZERO with something like: > > a,0,IFNAN
Take this one step further: Wouldn't a generic IF be more useful? You could still get NANORZERO with something like: a,UN,0,a,IF Erm... -- Alex van den Bogaerdt http://www.vandenbogaerdt.nl/rrdtool/ _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
