Hi Steve, this would be sort of like the COALECE operator in SQL ...
this does not solve the ALL NAN scenario though. cheers tobi Today Steve Hill wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:48:32AM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > > or if you insist to make this simpler, how about implementing a > > NANTOZERO operator ? > > Wouldn't a generic 'IFNAN' operator be more useful? That way I could > substitute any other value, as appropriate for my calculation. You > could still get the NANORZERO with something like: > > a,0,IFNAN > > Steve > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten http://it.oetiker.ch [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++41 62 213 9902 _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
