I disagree, it should beSG0sIGzldHMgi, not gd.
On Thu, 8 May 2003, emily, amanda wrote: ||SG0sIGxldHMgdHJ5IHRoaXMgYWdhaW4uLi4uLi4NCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCiAN ||CkhlbGxvIEpvw6NvIE1hcnF1ZXMsDQogDQpJIHdyb3RlIGEgZG9jdW1lbnQgZGV0YWlsaW5nIHN0 ||ZXAtYnktc3RlcCBvbiBob3cgdG8gaW5zdGFsbCBNUlRHL1JSRFRvb2wgb24gV2luZG93cyAyMDAw ||LiBJdHMgbG9jYXRlZCBoZXJlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNvbHNkLm9yZy9jaHMvc3RhZmYvZW1pbHkv ||bmV0d29yay9tcnRnLw0KIA0KSXQgc2hvdWxkIGhlbHAgeW91IG91dCB3aXRoIHlvdXIgcHJvYmxl ||bS4NCiANCi0tIA0KQW1hbmRhIEVtaWx5DQo= || ||-- ||Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users ||WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi || -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
