On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:44:03AM +0200, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:00:59AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > I've made a new RRA definition for 5 minute average, which rather than > > keeping only 600 rows, keeps 8640 rows (the objective being to retain 30 > > days worth of data at a 5 minute resolution). > > > > I would have thought that by specifying a start to rrdgraph that was say 2 > > weeks into the past, up until 300 seconds ago (one polling interval), would > > > So how can I use rrdgraph to get a "wider" graph, where no consolidation > > occurs? > > Two weeks in the past, minus 300 seconds (why ?!?), means 14*86400-300 > seconds. > Each pixel column should display 300 seconds, so your graph needs to be > (14*86400-300)/300 pixels wide. Good luck.
That was a hypothetical example. Let's say I want 3 days "width" at the 5 minute resolution. The same question still applies. Do I have to resort to "walking" along the graph in daily increments so as not to get consolidation? regards Andrew -- linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux April 18th to 23rd - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - LINUX Canberra, Australia - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Get bitten! -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
