On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Petteri Matilainen wrote: > It's the -Y option (see rrdgraph manpage). Try setting the Y-axis scale > and gridlines manually, without -Y. Using both at the same time could > result in messed up labels.
Thank you Petteri! I now use this command to generate the graph: /usr/bin/rrdtool graph /home/lennart/Projekte/scopeport-interface-web/rrd/loadavg.png --start 1198589209 --end N DEF:cpu1=/home/lennart/Projekte/scopeport-interface-web/rrd/loadavg.rrd:cpu1:AVERAGE AREA:cpu1#fbcf00:'CPU load average, last minute' DEF:cpu5=/home/lennart/Projekte/scopeport-interface-web/rrd/loadavg.rrd:cpu5:AVERAGE LINE2:cpu5#ff7800:'CPU load average, last 5 minutes' DEF:cpu15=/home/lennart/Projekte/scopeport-interface-web/rrd/loadavg.rrd:cpu15:AVERAGE LINE1:cpu15#ff0000:'CPU load average, last 15 minutes' VRULE:1198589149#A0A0A0 VRULE:1198607158#A0A0A0:'Client startup' -t 'CPU load [sundaysister]' -c FONT#c4a100 -c BACK#000000 -c CANVAS#292827 -c GRID#696969 -c MGRID#877254 -c AXIS#bdbdbd -c ARROW#bdbdbd -y 0.2:1 -X 1 It looks good. I used "-X 1" because without it i get a "0, 200m, 400m, 600m, 800m, 1000m" - Was that a good idea? Or is there something else wrong that causes this problem? Thank you. Lennart Koopmann _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
