Good to hear that you got it to work. The -X option was a good idea, as normally the y-axis unit will be scaled to appropriate units. With -X, the -Y may work too, but manual scaling and grid lines are a safer bet, in my opinion.
Lennart Koopmann wrote: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Petteri Matilainen wrote: > > >> It's the -Y option (see rrdgraph manpage). Try setting the Y-axis scale >> and gridlines manually, without -Y. Using both at the same time could >> result in messed up labels. >> > > Thank you Petteri! > > I now use this command to generate the graph: > > /usr/bin/rrdtool graph > /home/lennart/Projekte/scopeport-interface-web/rrd/loadavg.png --start > 1198589209 --end N > DEF:cpu1=/home/lennart/Projekte/scopeport-interface-web/rrd/loadavg.rrd:cpu1:AVERAGE > > AREA:cpu1#fbcf00:'CPU load average, last minute' > DEF:cpu5=/home/lennart/Projekte/scopeport-interface-web/rrd/loadavg.rrd:cpu5:AVERAGE > > LINE2:cpu5#ff7800:'CPU load average, last 5 minutes' > DEF:cpu15=/home/lennart/Projekte/scopeport-interface-web/rrd/loadavg.rrd:cpu15:AVERAGE > > LINE1:cpu15#ff0000:'CPU load average, last 15 minutes' > VRULE:1198589149#A0A0A0 VRULE:1198607158#A0A0A0:'Client startup' -t 'CPU > load [sundaysister]' -c FONT#c4a100 -c BACK#000000 -c CANVAS#292827 -c > GRID#696969 -c MGRID#877254 -c AXIS#bdbdbd -c ARROW#bdbdbd -y 0.2:1 -X 1 > > It looks good. I used "-X 1" because without it i get a "0, 200m, 400m, > 600m, 800m, 1000m" - Was that a good idea? Or is there something else > wrong that causes this problem? > > Thank you. > Lennart Koopmann > > _______________________________________________ > rrd-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users > _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
