Dave, >-----Original Message----- >From: David Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:30 PM >To: Templin, Fred L >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [rrg] and while we're at it, here's a view from >the ground... > >On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 02:50:14PM -0700, Templin, Fred L wrote: >> Dave, >> >> I don't understand the red-ink assertions about dual-stack; >> are you meaning to blame the network for lack of IPv6 uptake >> while application transition to IPv6 has been lagging? > > Fred, > > I'm not blaming anything. I'm not taking a position on > any of this stuff. I'm merely reporting on what I observe > going on on the ground.
I was reacting to what I perceived as a certain tone in some of the assertions, but when you say that you are not taking a position I take you at your word. One thing I will point out is that emerging solutions like dual-stack-lite and CGN are not necessarily mutually exclusive wrt what has traditionally been known as "dual stack"; this is documented in RANGER. Thanks - Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dave > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
