> Really, I would never have dared to offer a solution which depends on renumbering.
Why not? I think the majority of Internet users is either fine with PA addresses (small sites, roaming users) or within very large sites (say top 10.000 organizations). Both will benefit from improved support for multi-homing. I think smooth renumbering is just a next step. For IPv4, this would not be that easy. I'll not repeat all the objections already posted. But give me arguments for not improving multi-homing and smooth renumbering mechanisms for IPv6 and new applications, and even for IPv4. Let's not try to boil the ocean, but try to fix some problems. I think every site that sticks on PA addresses is a contribution to keep DFZ FIB in good shape. Teco _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
