On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-11-25 02:03, William Herrin wrote: >> 2. In strategy B, locator assignment is dynamic. > > Why is that a necessary property?
Because administrative management of of the locator assignments is too slow to react and too manpower intensive. The strategy is founded on renumbering to achieve topological aggregation of the locators. IMO, the only way such a strategy can succeed is if the administrative cost of renumbering is zero or so close to zero as makes no difference. > If that *is* a necessary property > of strategy B, then you have a missing strategy which is essentially > B with administratively assigned locators Fair point. This will be strategy H in the fourth draft. The fourth draft is now online. Do you or anyone else have additional comments on http://bill.herrin.us/network/rrgarchitectures.html before I close the document to additions and move on to exclusions? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
