On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Teco Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > / RFC 1887 4.4.2 is obviously not functional with *currently deployed > / network stacks*. It would need the kind of software described in > / strategy B or H in order to be viable. Or do you disagree? > > It depends.
Hi Teco, If it's conditionally functional and the conditions aren't met then it's not functional. Right? > / I vacillated on that for a while and eventually came down on the side > / of calling it a different strategy. I think if the difference was > / truly minor, IPv6 would have worked out a whole lot better than it > / has. > > Maybe this can be corrected. > Do you really think the Internet would work a whole lot better if we go for > this strategy? > I am with you!! In my opinion, IPv6 layer 3 is salvageable intact for a strategy B system, but layer 4 (TCP, UDP) will prove to be inadequate. Time will tell. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
