On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Robin Whittle <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't agree with the view that providing multihoming, TE and > portability by adding functionality to the network (DFZ, ISP routers > and end-user CE routers) is unnatural or undesirable.
Hi Robin, As it happens, I don't agree with that view either. I think strategy A is pretty good and it plays to our very solid experience with tunnelling and VPNs. I do, however, think it's premature to discard other approaches that stand a reasonable chance of solving the problem. Strategy A has not yet proven itself in market-accepted running code. When it has, the other approaches can be retired. >> Would anyone object to me assuming that those in favor of rejecting >> all but strategy A also favor proposals to reject each of the others >> individually? > > I support rejection of B, C, D, E and F, individually or collectively. What about G? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
