On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:07 AM, RJ Atkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with Steve Blake that a NAT-oriented approach, > which I gather is category "H", ought to get serious consideration.
Ran, Would you care to describe a NAT category which credibly addresses the routing scalability problem in a manner not already encompassed in widely deployed NAT systems? I have no intention of adding: Strategy H: We should use NAT! Major criticisms: We should use NAT to do what exactly? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
