On 2009-01-02 05:37, William Herrin wrote: > Ran, > > Please understand, I am neither for nor against the use of NAT as a > route reduction technique. I do, however, insist on me being able to > satisfactorily explain how a particular approach would reduce the need > or demand for core routing slots. Until someone, such as yourself, has > explained that to me well enough that I can explain it to someone > else, it isn't gong in the document.
Slide 15 in http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~brian/RRG0708.pdf Brian _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
