Oleg and Xu, There is clearly some synergy here with what is being proposed in RANGER/VET/SEAL. Xu, you may in particular be interested in looking at those documents for parallels with RANGI.
Thanks - Fred [email protected] >-----Original Message----- >From: Oleg Ponomarev [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:56 AM >To: Xu Xiaohu >Cc: 'RRG' >Subject: Re: [rrg] Rejecting all but Strategy A > >Hi! On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Xu Xiaohu wrote: > >>> And yes, the DNS server / proxy replies with HIT in AAAA >>> field for legacy applications. The locators can be found in >>> records for >>> 5.7.d.1.c.c.8.d.0.6.3.b.a.4.6.2.5.0.5.2.e.4.7.5.e.1.0.0.1.0.0. >>> 2.hit-to-ip.net >>> (when HIT is 2001:1e:574e:2505:264a:b360:d8cc:1d75) >> >> by the way, is there any HIP related RFC or draft for the above method? > >Unfortunately there is only a chapter in HIPL manual and an old >workshop paper at the moment, but I will submit some draft soon. > >http://hipl.hiit.fi/hipl/manual/ch24.html >http://trustinet.org/papers/ponomarev-ring-2007.pdf > >-- >Regards, Oleg. > >_______________________________________________ >rrg mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
