On 2009-02-03 10:09, John Zwiebel wrote: > The xTR in Europe would advertise 10/8 into the ALT. > > The xTR in NZ would advertise 10/8 into the ALT > > > > If you're in NZ, your map-request would be routed over the ALT to > that xTR > > If you're in Europe, your map-request would be routed over the ALT > to > > that xTR. > > > > If it is desired, the EID owner can modify the RLOC advertisements > so that > > encapsulated data packets will go to the RLOC he wants them to. > > > > If you want to move the EID-prefix to a different geographical > location, > > (NZ to Timbuctu) > > withdraw the route from NZ and start advertising it from Timbuctu. > Yes > > the RLOC > > will change. The ALT hierarchy doesn't change.
I thought that the big motivation behind the ALT heirarchy was that ALT nodes can aggregate prefixes aggressively higher up the ALT heirarchy. If you don't care about aggregation, then why have an ALT tree at all? - Dan Jen _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
