> And v6 is still in sufficient flux that changes are far more practical.I just about fell off my chair when I read that. Some years back there was a suggestion to change TCPv6 so that the pseudo-header (and checksum) only included the "ID" part of the IPv6 address, and it was shot down, because 'it would cause imcompatability with the installed base', or words to that effect.
Just because one person holds an opinion doesn't make it true. ;-) Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
