Yes. That was the point of my comment at the mike in the session.
I like some of the soltuions that do host based handling, in part
because they allow for things like multipath TCP.
But, if we are going to do that, we are going to have to actually make
renumbering a LOT easier. We are going to have to address the issues in
Brian Carpenter's draft. I believe that some of the issues will
themselves be made easier by the separation of identifiers from
locators. But it will take more work than that.
Yours,
Joel
Michael Menth wrote:
...
We also discovered that issue. Probably we can say, it's hard to combine
the following three things:
1. Multihoming
2. Active multipath routing by the host
3. Local addresses hiding information about global locators which makes
renumbering easier.
Regards,
Michael
Noel
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg