On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Christopher Morrow <[email protected] > wrote:
> Not everything has to be named. For the interface, all we need is an > > noel can explain a bunch more of this, but.. I think 'name' in his > context isnt 'mail.lcs.mit.edu' but rather: "192.168.2.2" in today's > parlance, in tomorrows LOC/ID separated world though it's possible > that it's something entirely different a local IDENTIFIER, with > perhaps a LOCATOR concatenated. Representing that thing isn't clearly > defined (that I've seen) so: "name" works... for now. > > -chris > I see. I'm quite behind. Question: In this arrangement, will the name (possibly concatenation of a local ID and a local Loc) then be globally unique? Or is it the intention of people that even the name may not be global? -- Regards, DY http://cnu.kr/~dykim
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
