On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > Dae Young KIM wrote: > > Question: In this arrangement, will the name (possibly concatenation of a >> local ID and a local Loc) then be globally unique? Or is it the intention of >> people that even the name may not be global? >> > > This is now into the realm of variations among proposals. Both are > reasonable and workable alternatives. > > However, if one chooses a locally unique identifier, then there are more > mobility issues.
Yes, definitely. > If one chooses globally unique identifiers, then you have to have a > mechanism to ensure uniqueness. > If we take the current assignment of IPv4 and IPv6 as identifiers, then we can assure the global uniqueness of the identifiers. But, with awakening of Christopher and Noel, I realized the ID should be exposed also in inter-domain routing, extra to the AS # that I chose to take, then perhaps I might not be able to keep the gateway routing table from explosion. > > In many cases, statistical uniqueness with a detection and recovery > algorithm will be acceptable Here I might seek your education, if you don't mind. Statistical? Detection and recovery algorithm? > . > > Tony > -- Regards, DY http://cnu.kr/~dykim
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
