[email protected] allegedly wrote on 11/25/2009 6:09 PM: > Whenever I mentioned, how badly MIP is handled by all models of the > well-positioned RRG-contributors, the response was silence. In the > LISP-mailinglist discussion this issue is officially > deferred.Bottom-line: Let's push LISP as it is and let's think about MIP > later, when LISP is well anchored. > > It seams to me that inside RRG this issue isn't handled differently.
Lixia pointed out that mobility is a fundamental requirement but not a fundamental component. For any proposal RRG have come up with, there are at least several ways to support mobility. RRG's focus is rightly on routing and addressing architecture. There is reason for confidence that whatever we nail down for routing and addressing, we can build mobility on top of it. Scott _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
