Did anyone indicate if multicast was a fundamental requirement or
fundamental component?
Dino
On Nov 25, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
[email protected] allegedly wrote on 11/25/2009 6:09 PM:
Whenever I mentioned, how badly MIP is handled by all models of the
well-positioned RRG-contributors, the response was silence. In the
LISP-mailinglist discussion this issue is officially
deferred.Bottom-line: Let's push LISP as it is and let's think
about MIP
later, when LISP is well anchored.
It seams to me that inside RRG this issue isn't handled differently.
Lixia pointed out that mobility is a fundamental requirement but not a
fundamental component. For any proposal RRG have come up with, there
are at least several ways to support mobility. RRG's focus is rightly
on routing and addressing architecture. There is reason for
confidence
that whatever we nail down for routing and addressing, we can build
mobility on top of it.
Scott
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
