Robin Whittle wrote:
Short version:   The RRG Design Goals document cold be used as the
                 basis for a "template", but was based on very
                 little discussion and AFAIK has not achieved
                 consensus.


Robin,

When the discussion of the design goals slowed, we judged that to indicate rough consensus.



                 I suggest that concise summaries mention how
                 suitable the proposal is for voluntary adoption in
                 IPv4 and IPv6 - perhaps with reference to this list
                 of constraints:

              http://www.firstpr.com.au/ip/ivip/RRG-2009/constraints/


While you're more than welcome to do so, this is not a requirement.

Tony
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to